Then you're wrong =) They're superfeedr's biggest subscriber!
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Travis Yaremco <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't imagine Google Reader is a superfeedr subscriber... > > Is there any quick way I can get this feed published on > http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com? I understand that feeds with no > subscribers are ignored by this hub and Google Reader refuses to > subscribe. > > On Nov 30, 4:10 pm, Julien Genestoux <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Maybe superfeedr can sponsor the quotas for this app? > > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Brett Slatkin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >http://pubsubhubbub-subscriber.appspot.com/has no quota left, so you > > > can't test with it. > > > > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Travis Yaremco <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> I don't have any code, but I guess I could do that. It's just a > > >> Feedburner feed with Pingshot. I would expect Google's own Feedburner > > >> should be a reliable delivery method. > > > > >> When I subscribe my feed to the example subscriber app (async verify, > > >> sync verify I just get an error) I get this: > > > > >> Subscription Details -http://feeds.feedburner.com/CustomReddit > > >> Callback URL: http://pubsubhubbub-subscriber.appspot.com/ > > >> Created time (UTC): 2010-11-30T21:52:44Z > > >> Last modified time (UTC): 2010-11-30T21:55:36Z > > >> Expiration time (UTC): 2010-12-05T21:52:44Z > > >> State: not_verified > > >> Confirmation failures: 0 > > >> Delivery to domain: OK > > >> Delivery short-term: 100% errors > > > > >> What can be understood from this? > > > > >> On Nov 30, 2:32 pm, Brett Slatkin <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> Ah sorry I misread your email. I thought you were using subscriber > > >>> diagnostics. It's possible that Google reader is using a custom URL > > >>> variant for cache breaking or some other purpose, so the topic URL > may > > >>> not be identical. I think the best way to test your code is to set up > > >>> your own subscription and confirm the data is delivered through. > > > > >>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Travis Yaremco <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >>>> Alright, thanks. But there is only one field for publisher > > >>>> diagnostics (Topic URL). Are you saying there should be parameters > > >>>> passed in the Topic URL? > > > > >>>> The delay between the pipe and feedburner I'm not too worried about. > > >>>> What I'd like to know is why changes to the feedburner feed don't > > >>>> appear immediately. It behaves as though Reader simply doesn't > > >>>> subscribe despite a perfectly valid PuSH feed. > > > > >>>> On Nov 30, 1:31 pm, Brett Slatkin <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Travis Yaremco < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>> Because the original feed is a Pipe and not PuSH compliant I just > wait > > >>>>>> 30 min until Feedburner polls or use the ping function in > Feedburner. > > >>>>>> I understand this is where Pingshot comes in: if the Feedburner > feed > > >>>>>> has changed at that point, it notifies the hub. Is this right? > > > > >>>>> Correct. Thought the 30 minute number is probably not accurate. I > > >>>>> think it depends on how frequent your feed updates and how many > > >>>>> subscribers you have? > > > > >>>>>> Also, shouldn't I be able to see publisher diagnostics at > > >>>>>>https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/publishfortheFeedburner feed? It > > >>>>>> cannot find the record despite Google Reader being a subscriber. > > > > >>>>> To see those diagnostics you need to know the subscriber's specific > > >>>>> parameters, such as callback URl and shared secret. You don't have > > >>>>> those, so you can't get the debug information. However, you could > set > > >>>>> up your own subscription to the same feed using your own code and > then > > >>>>> debug delivery in that way to see what the delay is from when the > pipe > > >>>>> gets new info to when feedburner sends the pings through. > > > > >>>>>> On Nov 30, 11:16 am, Brett Slatkin <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>> Are you pinging FeedBurner when the feed is published? If not, > how > > >>>>>>> will the hub know that there's new content to distribute to > > >>>>>>> subscribers? > > > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Travis Yaremco < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> For example, here is a Yahoo Pipe that I've 'burned': > > >>>>>>>>http://feeds.feedburner.com/CustomReddit. I can refresh that > URL, and > > >>>>>>>> see new items appear. They don't appear in Reader, however, > until > > >>>>>>>> refresh. > > > > >>>>>>>> On Nov 29, 5:05 pm, Travis Yaremco <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> That's what I though too, so I made a few Feedburner feeds with > > >>>>>>>>> Pingshot enabled to test it out. I can see changes on > > >>>>>>>>> feeds.feedburner.com but they don't appear in Google Reader > until the > > >>>>>>>>> feed is polled (which in this case takes hours as I am the only > > >>>>>>>>> subscriber) or I click refresh. > > > > >>>>>>>>> I've read that Google Reader shows updates to Wordpress rss in > > >>>>>>>>> realtime. Can anyone confirm whether Feedburner-Pingshot > should have > > >>>>>>>>> this functionality as well? > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Nov 29, 4:46 pm, Charl van Niekerk <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Travis Yaremco < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> How close is Google Reader to becoming a subscriber to > PubSubHubbub > > >>>>>>>>>>> feeds? Are there currently any rss readers that are PuSH > subscribers? > > > > >>>>>>>>>> According to this page, the Google Reader integration has been > completed: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>http://code.google.com/p/pubsubhubbub/wiki/HubbubAtGoogle > > > > >
