+1
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Julien Genestoux <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > I think it's time to move forward and clean up the protocol a bit. Right > now, I believe it is too specific on some points (explicit support for > Atom), but also a little too vague on other points. > I probably don't want to discuss all the changes in details in this thread, > but maybe list a couple ideas, as well as get volunteers to help with this. > The goal is too clean up the spec, and maybe write a couple > extensions/guideline on top of it for specific use cases (private > resources)... > Here is in my mind a couple things that needs to be > addresses/changed/updated/improved: > - Support for arbitrary content > - Support for private feeds > - Removal of verify_token > - Subscription invalidation/expiration > - Publisher - Hub relationship > - Topic "redirection". > Please add your topic/name to that list and post another message to address > it in more details. Hopefully this thread will help us keep track of what > changes are being worked on.
