Monica, I'd love to attend, but I'm in in the SF Bay arear aournd these dates. Please make sure someone writes down some kind of minutes so I can catch up.
Julien On Nov 20, 6:09 pm, Monica Wilkinson <[email protected]> wrote: > Also is there interest in getting together face to face in SF to kickoff > the new set of changes ?http://www.doodle.com/2k7gtwchaqifa2vu > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Monica Wilkinson > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > Cool created the org and added you and Brad to owners. I couldn't find > > Brett on github but if you know his handle feel free to add him. > >https://github.com/organizations/pubsubhubbub > > > Before we add contributors shall we ask people to sign an OWFa CLA ? > > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Julien Genestoux < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> I'd love that :) > > >> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Monica Wilkinson < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>> In that case it seems fine if your goal is to do a new draft version. > > >>> BTW What do you think about adding pubsubhubub to github to do this next > >>> version and get more pull requests and contributions overall ? > > >>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Julien Genestoux < > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> Ha, yes, I should have mentioned this... Yes, I believe callback url > >>>> should allow for query strings... > >>>> Julien > > >>>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Monica Wilkinson < > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>> So this appears to be a breaking change... Is a possible workaround > >>>>> for subscribers to say that the callback url includes a query string > >>>>> parameter "hub.verify_token" > > >>>>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Julien Genestoux < > >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>> All, > > >>>>>> In the process of "cleaning" up the spec and to make it ready to add > >>>>>> more important coverage (arbitrary format, private feeds), I identified > >>>>>> that we should probably remove the "hub.verify_token". > > >>>>>> I'm not completely sure why it was initially added (Brett, Brad, > >>>>>> Mart?), but I think it was to facilitate the matching of a feed and > >>>>>> subscription for the subscriber who gets a verification of intent > >>>>>> request. > >>>>>> I believe this can all be done thru the callback url, which (as per the > >>>>>> good practices) should be different for each subscription/feed. > > >>>>>> I'm not sure how to submit changes to the protocol, but this would > >>>>>> affect the following sections : > >>>>>> 6.1 : Removal of : > > >>>>>>> hub.verify_token > >>>>>>> OPTIONAL. A subscriber-provided opaque token that will be echoed > >>>>>>> back in the verification request to assist the subscriber in > >>>>>>> identifying > >>>>>>> which subscription request is being verified. If this is not > >>>>>>> included, no > >>>>>>> token will be included in the verification request. > > >>>>>> 6.2 : Removal of : > > >>>>>>> hub.verify_token > >>>>>>> OPTIONAL. The subscriber-provided opaque token from the > >>>>>>> corresponding subscription request, if one was provided. > > >>>>>> 6.2.1 Change of the first paragraph (remove the red): > > >>>>>>> The subscriber MUST confirm that the hub.topic and hub.verify_token > >>>>>>> correspond to a pending subscription or unsubscription that it > >>>>>>> wishes to carry out. [...] > > >>>>>> 8.2 : Removal of section altogether. > > >>>>>> Feedback? > > >>>>>> Thanks!
