Great!  Sure, I'll keep an eye on things over the next couple days.  Should 
I re-subscribe to trouble feeds, or stick with existing subscriptions?

rw

On Monday, August 20, 2012 8:03:33 AM UTC-7, Roman Perepelitsa wrote:
>
> Hi Ryan,
>
> I've made a couple of fixes. Could you check whether things have improved 
> on your end?
>
> Roman.
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Ryan Williams <[email protected]<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> Thanks Roman, I appreciate your help and work on improving reliability.
>>
>> On Thursday, August 16, 2012 6:51:41 AM UTC-7, Roman Perepelitsa wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Ryan Williams <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ah, good catch. It does seem to be mostly an issue with FeedBurner 
>>>> feeds. Thanks for looking into it.  Radar is coming through now along with 
>>>> ReadWriteWeb.  Still no notifications for TechCrunch, TechDirt, and 
>>>> GigaOm, 
>>>> among other FB feeds.
>>>>
>>>> This seems to indicate true/open PubSubHubbub is not reliable when 
>>>> perhaps the largest publisher has these problems? Does FeedBurner care 
>>>> about it working?  I'm not trying to be dramatic, but rather just trying 
>>>> to 
>>>> get a feel for the environment as its been over a year since I did my 
>>>> first 
>>>> client implementation and now trying to do one again.
>>>>
>>>> Not to single FeedBurner out either, because pushpress is very 
>>>> problematic too, at least with the subscription process.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I feel your pain, Ryan.
>>>
>>> We are actively working on improving reliability of the hub on 
>>> pubsubhubbub.appspot.com. We are also looking at the issue affecting 
>>> FeedBurner feeds.
>>>
>>> I know and like Superfeedr, and it protects me from most of these 
>>>> issues, but in theory it's just a little bit more work to subscribe to a 
>>>> feed's hub for which there is no cost, if all is working right.
>>>>
>>>> Is it advisable or best practice with PubSubHubbub to create clients 
>>>> that fallback to polling and/or use services like Superfeedr?
>>>>
>>>
>>> We are committed to making the hub very reliable so that you won't have 
>>> to resort to polling.
>>>
>>> Roman.
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to