Sorry Bob, you're right. It's more a could than a should :)
My point was that there are many things that can break in the whole
process which would prevent the deletion
from being reflected.

Thanks,

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Bob Wyman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Julien Genestoux
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I'm afraid this is going to be something that needs to be addressed
>> with Flipboard and Feedly.
>>
>> In theory, Atom has "thumbstones" for deleted content, and in theory,
>> these should be propagated by
>> the hubs, and in theory the publishers should delete the corresponding
>> entries.
>
> It is important to recognize that the receiver of an Atom Tombstone is under
> no obligation to do anything. One's publication of data on the Internet must
> never be seen as obligating another to act in the absence of some prior
> agreement to do so. Thus, it is not correct to say that a receiver of a
> tombstone "should delete the corresponding entries."  RFC 6721  wisely and
> explicitly states:
>>
>> Publishers of feeds containing at:deleted-entry elements should note that
>> the at:deleted-entry element is advisory in nature only, and it may be
>> ignored by Atom Processors. The presence of an at:deleted-entry element does
>> not guarantee that the atom:entry to which it is referring will no longer be
>> available. For example, if an entry was published to a feed document that
>> was published and processed yesterday by an aggregator application, and then
>> is subsequently deleted today with a corresponding at:deleted-entry element
>> added to the feed as a signal that the entry was deleted, there is no
>> guarantee that the aggregator application will pay any attention to the
>> at:deleted-entry element during subsequent processing operations.
>
>
>>
>> Now, as you've guessed, somewhere in that theory, something broke and
>> the only way to get the content
>> deleted is to reach out to both Feedly and Flipboard.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Robert Kennedy <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > We are using pubsubhubbub on wordpress. We deleted some text blogs, but
>> > they
>> > are still showing up in our feeds to Flipboard and Feedly. Any
>> > suggestions
>> > on how to fix?
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > ---
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups
>> > "Pubsubhubbub" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> > an
>> > email to [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Pubsubhubbub" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Pubsubhubbub" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pubsubhubbub" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to