This should be straightforward. urwid.Flowwidget, from which VariableWidget derives, is described by its docstring as the "base class of widgets that determine their rows from the number of columns available." So it shouldn't be too hard to do wrapping. I'll look into it. I'll be touching near that part of the code anyway when I implement custom stringifiers tomorrow. Also, I remembered that this is a feature that I've wanted before too.
Aaron Meurer On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Sundance <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 09:59:39PM -0600, Aaron Meurer wrote: > >> And for what it's worth, I kind of prefer it the way it is in my >> branch, with just keyboard shortcuts. > > Whoa, thank you Aaron, this rocks! It's exciting to see one of the most useful > Python dev tools out there get even better. > > While we're talking PuDB improvements, might I petition for line wrapping in > the variables box? That's one of the few things I miss in PuDB. I feel a > little > sheepish asking for this when I could dive in the code and implement it > myself, > but I have to admit it will probably be done much quicker if I ask someone who > already has a good grasp of the code. > > Ta, > > -- S. > > _______________________________________________ > Pudb mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.tiker.net/listinfo/pudb > _______________________________________________ Pudb mailing list [email protected] http://lists.tiker.net/listinfo/pudb
