On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 15:53 -0400, Brian Bouterse wrote:
> One related comment on this is my desire to avoid getters and setters.
>
> For example let's say my_field is the JSON field. I hope we can do this:
>
> my_model = TheModelClass()
> my_model.my_field = {'a': 1, 'b': 2} # this is setting with a dict
> my_mode.save() # the field contents are now JSON serialized in the DBThis will be abstracted, as it is on all other models to work like this. > Also this: > > my_model = TheModelClass.get(pk='12345') > type(my_model.my_field) # This would show dictionary not string I'm not sure of what the resulting type it will definitely show is, but I am fairly confident it will not be a string, as the whole point of implementing the custom field is to abstract away the underlying storage mechanism's data format with the data format the code is excpecting to work with. > Is that possible with this implementation idea? What do others think > about this? > > Thanks for doing this @pcreech! No problemo! > -Brian > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
