+1 to cron. The syntax is super simple [0], and I believe sysadmins
already think of schedules in terms of cron.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cron#Overview
On 09/06/2016 04:47 PM, Patrick Creech wrote:
During the course of the Task modeling work for Pulp 3, it was mentioned that
some discussion should
he had around the use of ISO8601 date fields to control task scheduling.
So to start this conversation, I pose two questions:
1) Should we do away with the use of ISO8601 date fields for scheduling
purposes?
2) If yes to 1, what scheduling format should we move to? There were talks
about utilizing a system
similar to cron to specify the schedules
_______________________________________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
_______________________________________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
