Hi Brian, Thank you very much for the warm welcome and the quick reply!
On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 17:13:44 -0500 Brian Bouterse wrote: > but would you be willing to file a story for each of the feature PRs? > Here are some docs on filing a story[0]. As releases are prepared, we > rely on the issue tracker to track what has gone into a given > release. Of course. I will do my best. Sorry for not having done that already. Your developer docs are really nice and constantly getting better. > Also for the > story PRs can those be rebased against master and the PRs updated to merge > against master? Master is where we put the new features. Sure, I am glad to try. Except one, all patches should be no-brainers in that regard. The company I did the work for works with 2.9, therefore I based everything on 2.9-dev. > Also as an FYI, the vagrant setup that most of the developers use is pretty > great. Did you use that to develop these patches? Yep, took me some time to make it work on my Debian-based devel boxes but was of tremendous help overall. Thank you very much for that! > I'll try to find someone who can help review these other stories. Please > send questions or feedback via email or IRC. We would love to hear from > you. Thank you again for the contribution. Thank _you_ again for hints and help. I will try to deliver stories and master-based PRs as soon as possible. -- ulif
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
