+1 On 01/30/2017 04:16 PM, Sean Myers wrote: > We've had similar discussions in the past and, iirc, we're generally in favor > of moving to a cherry-picking model from master to release branches. The (a?) > problem is that the Pulp 2 build system is heavily dependent on the merge > forward logic, so if we did switch to cherry-picking, it would be for Pulp 3. > > That said, I'm +1 for cherry-picking from master to release branches for Pulp > 3+, and largely for the reasons you state here. As the current "guy who knows > which branch to open PRs against", it would be great if, when asked what > branch > to open PRs against, the answer was always "master".
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
