On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Tom McKay <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why is it important that pulp be limited by the crane/docker api for > export/import? Is it a "it's hard and we don't want to support it" > argument, or is there a real technical aspect? "None of the above." I'd describe it as: we want to offer one type-agnostic way to export and import content with two pulp deployments, and it is doable, but it would be a ton of work to add it to Pulp 2. We'll save a lot of time and effort, and end up with a better solution, by pursuing this with Pulp 3. Michael
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
