On 03/14/2017 12:01 PM, Mihai Ibanescu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> <snip> 
> 
> Do you like how the lines prefixed with pulp: look like? I know it's not my
> goal to write a dep solver in pulp for debian packages, and I don't know
> how well I can map Mongo queries on this data structure for disjunctions (I
> think everything else should be fine). Does anyone have a concern with the
> proposed data structures?

I think they're an improvement over deb822, but am similarly wondering how
that will work for depsolving. For just republishing package metadata, though,
the "pulp" data structures seem easier to work with, and make sense to me.

I have no concerns. :)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Reply via email to