I have updated the proposal’s motivation section. Note that the actual change/workflow hasn’t changed at all.
David On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 4:08 PM, David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > Looks like @bmbouter made a comment to include this but I forgot to > include it: > > https://github.com/pulp/pups/pull/3#discussion_r111498031 > > Will update the PUP. > > > David > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Michael Hrivnak <mhriv...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I think we need to redo the git workflow because we can't continue to >>> resolve conflicts during merge forward as we did before. I see that as the >>> central issue the PUP is resolving. >> >> >> The PUP likely needs additional revision in that case; it does not >> mention conflict resolution at all as a motivation. It would be valuable to >> spell that out and discuss it. >> >> >> -- >> >> Michael Hrivnak >> >> Principal Software Engineer, RHCE >> >> Red Hat >> > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
