This reminds me of the concept of a "Do-ocracy". If developers take the time to research and write up a proposal, they have "done". It seems completely reasonable to default to the opinion of the people that cared enough to do the work. If it isn't the right decision, then someone must actively block it, simple as that.
I think the rule should be "PUP passes if we have at least one +1 and no -1s".
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
