Ah, I missed adding the relative path to the join table. This is a fine idea as well.
On 06/30/2017 10:15 AM, Michael Hrivnak wrote: > > Jeff, earlier in the thread we talked about using the through table to hold > the path. I think that's the right > place, because the path would be a property of the relationship between an > artifact and a content unit. It > also occurred to me that the file name could be different for different > content, so maybe the path would need > to include the filename. That seems a bit weird, but I think it has to be the > case if we use a many-to-many > relationship.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
