+1  https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2870

On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 2:08 PM, David Davis <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 from me.
>
> At the very least, we could try it out for a while and see how it goes.
>
>
> David
>
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Brian Bouterse <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> @daviddavis thanks for the flake8 fixes.
>>
>> I was thinking we should enable pep8speaks [1] for all of our branches
>> and repos. We can still have Travis or other places run flake8 but that
>> would put it right in the PR comments.
>>
>> [1]: https://github.com/OrkoHunter/pep8speaks
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 12:03 PM, David Davis <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I just merged a PR to fix flake8 on the 3.0-dev branch of Pulp[0]. It
>>> also fixes the flake8 warnings that came up while flake8 was not running in
>>> Travis.
>>>
>>> If you’re developing Pulp 3, please rebase your branch with 3.0-dev from
>>> upstream. Also for bonus points, check the Travis logs for your PRs to make
>>> sure flake8 is running on the entire codebase and not via “git diff…”.
>>>
>>> Let me know if you need any help.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pulp/pull/3019
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Reply via email to