I've thought about this some more and given my role as the community manager, I would like to host the demos and deliver the content I have planned. This is what I see from other projects like Foreman. This content regularly conflicts with the "State of Pulp" content. The YouTube live demos are something I started for Pulp, and something I would like to stay involved with.
I want to go back to @asmacdo's idea of renaming the State of Pulp to "Release Updates". You're welcome to deliver that or someone who does the releases themselves would be good. Some feedback on this change would be great. Thanks, Brian On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Michael Hrivnak <mhriv...@redhat.com> wrote: > Sure, I'd be happy to do that. I do think there's plenty of room for a > "What's happening with the technology" segment and a "What else is going on > in the community" segment if you'd like to keep doing highlights there, but > otherwise I am happy to take care of it. > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> The content you are describing is the same content I usually plan to >> cover also. Then on the day-of we realize that we have the same content. I >> think this is the root of the issue that is causing me to raise this >> problem to begin with. Switching the name won't resolve it. >> >> In looking at a community like Forman for example, Greg, the community >> manager, runs the demos and coordinates the content updates that you are >> describing. I'm wondering why Pulp is doing something different. >> >> It sounds like you want to deliver all of that content. That is ok with >> me if you are also willing to run/coordinate/post the demos. Would that be >> a way to solve this? We have docs here [0] about how to do that. Feedback >> about this idea would be great. >> >> [0]: https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/Sprint_Demo_Notes >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Michael Hrivnak <mhriv...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I'm happy to change the name of my section to something other than >>> "State of Pulp", which isn't very descriptive. I want it to continue >>> focusing on what's happening with the technology, such as releases, new >>> initiatives getting started (new plugin for example), specific current >>> problems (coredump on F26 for example), highlighting areas of investigation >>> or planning (like when we were wrestling with how to support multi-arch >>> container images), deprecations (no more EL6 for example), etc. "Tech >>> Update" would be fine, or something similar. >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Austin Macdonald <amacd...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 to "Release Updates" because it doesn't make an artificial >>>> distinction between work done by Red Hat employees and work done by the >>>> community. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> During the sprint demos there are two sections which regularly (if not >>>>> always) present redundant content: the State of Pulp update, and the >>>>> Community Update. We need to combine or redefine these parts of our demos >>>>> to not be redundant or compete for content to present in each section. >>>>> Today the content was 100% redundant to the point where I entirely skipped >>>>> the community update. >>>>> >>>>> Please send ideas or comments. Here are two options I can think of: >>>>> >>>>> Have the State of Pulp be renamed to 'Release Updates' and have that >>>>> section talk about releases and any notable issues associated with them. >>>>> This is the option I recommend. >>>>> >>>>> Only have a community update and have all content (release updates, >>>>> community items, etc) all be delivered through that. I believe this is how >>>>> most projects do it, but I would prefer the option above personally. >>>>> >>>>> -Brian >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Michael Hrivnak >>> >>> Principal Software Engineer, RHCE >>> >>> Red Hat >>> >> >> > > > -- > > Michael Hrivnak > > Principal Software Engineer, RHCE > > Red Hat >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
