On 03/12/2018 10:28 AM, Jeff Ortel wrote:
On 03/08/2018 10:13 AM, Austin Macdonald wrote:
Motivation:
The name "importer" carries some inaccurate implications.
1) Importers should "import". Tasks like "sync" will do the actual importing. The object only holds the configuration that happens to be used by sync tasks. 2) Sync tasks on mirror mode remove content as well as add it, so "import" isn't quite right.

Proposed name: Remote

The inspiration for remote is "git remote". In git, remotes represent external repositories, which is almost exactly what our importers do.

+1, The git/ostree "remote" concept applies very well to most of what an "importer" defines in pulp.


-------------------------------------------------------
Part 2: Trim the fields

Currently, Importers have settings that can be categorized in 2 ways. I am proposing removing the "sync settings" from the Remote model:

External Source information
    name
    feed_url
    validate
    ssl_ca_certificate
    ssl_client_certificate
    ssl_client_key
    ssl_validation
    proxy_url
    username
    password

Sync settings
    download_policy
    sync_mode

This had some advantages when Importers were related to Repositories. For example, having a repository.importer that always used the same sync mode made sense. However, the "how" to sync settings don't make much sense when importers and repositories are not linked. It seems very reasonable that a user might have 2 repositories that sync from the same source (ex EPEL). It does not make sense for them to have create an Importer for the EPEL repository twice or more just to change sync_mode or download policy. Instead of modeling these fields, I propose that they should POST body parameters.

I, as a user, don't like having to specify download_policy & sync_mode on every request.  The burden on the user to passing these consistently seems unnecessary and prone to error.  And, like something that pulp should store as part of it's value proposition.   Imagine an organization with tons of repositories and admins.  They would need to maintain a spreadsheet, notes, scripts for these settings so that admin A is syncing using the same settings as admin B.

Perhaps download_policy &  sync_mode should be attributes of the repository.  Thoughts on moving them there.  The sync_mode (mirror/additive) may need to be renamed in a way that changes it from describing how the importer is syning to something that defines the type of repository.  Like that the repository is intended to be a mirror or not.  Perhaps just a "mirror" (bool) attribute.

I have reconsidered this.  Disregard.


example
POST v3/remotes/1234/sync/ repositorty=myrepo_href sync_mode=additive, dl_policy=immediate POST v3/remotes/1234/sync/ repositorty=myother_href sync_mode=mirror, dl_policy=deferred



_______________________________________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev


_______________________________________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Reply via email to