> > >> I'm hoping to continue the "Infrastructure" Redmine project for things > like website hosting. I see what you mean though because it will be > developed and released separately. I think we're in a similar situation for > 3 things: the ansible installer, the migration tool, and CLI, and for each > of them we should either make their own Redmine projects or a tag under > Pulp. We already have many Redmine projects and they are kind of a pain so > I want to float a tags based approach for feedback. Perhaps keeping them > out of "Pulp" means that we remove all the existing tags from them and tag > them with new tags like 'Ansible Installer', '2to3 Migration' and 'CLI'? >
I had hoped that someday there would be a separate group of committers for pulp/devel or wherever we keep it. Also, I wouldnt want potential users/PMs to see a "bug count" that includes non-user facing issues. These concerns are trivial though, and if projects are a pain, I'm fine with keeping Tags. Since projects are a pain, can we get rid of the "external" project? https://pulp.plan.io/projects/external/issues
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
