So red before meant that these were items we needed to make a decision on later. They were gaps in our design or plan.
Now, do statements in red mean we need to discuss them now? Put another way, what are the next steps to resolve these newly identified gaps. We will have plenty of items that have no [done] or [in-progress] - which leave not started. Was this meant to identify gaps in plan or gaps in execution? On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Dennis Kliban <dkli...@redhat.com> wrote: > Milan and I spent some time auditing our Plugin API section[0] of the MVP > document. I have updated the document with our findings[1]. > > There is now a lot more red, but it is mostly related to documentation and > bad wording of use cases. > > [0] https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/Pulp_3_Minimum_ > Viable_Product#Plugin-API > [1] https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/Pulp_3_Minimum_ > Viable_Product/diff?utf8=%E2%9C%93&version=154&version_ > from=153&commit=View+differences > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
