Hey David, thanks, +1
-- milan On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 1:49 PM, David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > I’ve opened a PR with the process on how to revise a PUP. Reviews/feedback > are welcome: > > https://github.com/pulp/pups/pull/11 > > I’d also like to call a vote on this proposed change. Here’s the voting > model from PUP-1: > > +1: "Will benefit the project and should definitely be adopted." > +0: "Might benefit the project and is acceptable." > -0: "Might not be the right choice but is acceptable." > -1: "I have serious reservations that need to be thought through and > addressed." > > Deadline will be July 22, 2018. > > David > > > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 11:14 AM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> While there is a process for revising PUPs before they are accepted[0], >> we don’t have any process for revising PUPs after they are accepted. I’d >> like to upate PUP-1[1] to create a simple but formal process for revising >> accepted PUPs. >> >> I was thinking we should add a section (“Revising an Accepted PUP”) that >> says say revising a PUP follows the same process as creating a new PUP. >> This includes an initial discussion period followed by a PR against the PUP >> with the proposed change. After that, there should be a vote decided by our >> existing lazy consensus model. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md#revision >> [1] https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md >> >> David >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
