Not entierly sure, that this is related, but a while ago, we laid out a road map for the pulp3_deb plugin [1]. It includes 8 different publishers, that publish different metadata for the same repository version. As far as i understand, that is exactly, what PublishedArtifacts are for. If it were possible to just use ordinary Artifacts and associate them with a Publication instead of a RepositoryVersion it might be ok in that context.
Cheers, Matthias [1] https://etherpad.net/p/pulp-deb-pulp3/timeslider#2902 On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:45:15 -0400 Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> wrote: > A plugin writer (@oleksander) pointed out to me that PublishedArtifact > seems a bit out of place for his usage. I can see why he thinks that, > and after thinking about it, Pulp does seem a bit over-complicated in > this area. I've written [0] to describe the problem, promote > discussion of this issue, and hopefully decide on a resolution. > > [0]: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4020 > > Discussion and collaboration is welcome! > > -Brian
pgpzw4y_hM6_9.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev