Folks, couple of interesting questions popped up while trying to figure how to integrate Fus[1] with Pulp to minimize duplicating code, that I'd like to poll the opinions about:
* how do we infer which platform should the solver consider for evaluating the modular dependencies, if there are multiple platforms required/available? * do we want all the possible alternatives, satisfying a module's modular dependencies, to be copied or just the first match? * libsolv-based solvers aren't capable of delivering a best-effort resolution: a conflict or an unsatisfied dependency will break the recursive copy, are we cool with that? Thanks, milan [1] https://github.com/fedora-modularity/fus
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
