+1
On 12/1/18 6:01 AM, David Davis wrote:
+1 from me.
David
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:26 AM Dennis Kliban <dkli...@redhat.com
<mailto:dkli...@redhat.com>> wrote:
No objections from me.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 7:50 AM Brian Bouterse
<bbout...@redhat.com <mailto:bbout...@redhat.com>> wrote:
The plan about 12-24 months ago was to distribute Pulp3 with
Pulp itself on a machine hosted in the osci.io
<http://osci.io> community environment. We have this ticket
tracking that work [0] (still at NEW).
I commented [1] that I think our distribution plans now
involve mainly PyPI releases, and we probably won't self-host
our release infrastructure. Is that what others think?
If we aren't self-hosting with Pulp, can we close this ticket
[0], clean up the infra wiki [2], and ask OSCI to deprovision
their machine?
[0]: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2325
[1]: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2325#note-32
[2]:
https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/Infrastructure_&_Hosting#Distribute-Pulp-with-Pulp
Thanks!
Brian
_______________________________________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com <mailto:Pulp-dev@redhat.com>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
_______________________________________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com <mailto:Pulp-dev@redhat.com>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
_______________________________________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
_______________________________________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
