We don't have an official process, but bringing it up here is a good place to start.
Depending on the changes, it would be best to update the docs: https://docs.pulpproject.org/en/3.0/nightly/concepts.html https://docs.pulpproject.org/en/3.0/nightly/glossary.html https://docs.pulpproject.org/en/3.0/nightly/components.html# On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:53 AM Eric Helms <ehe...@redhat.com> wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. I should know this, but if I wanted to propose an > official change to the nomenclature what is the correct process? > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:47 AM Dennis Kliban <dkli...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:34 AM Eric Helms <ehe...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> Howdy, >>> >>> Within Pulp 3, I've found myself struggling to refer to the pieces of >>> the runtime deployment and wanted to raise a few questions I keep coming >>> back to. >>> >>> 1) Per [1], pulpcore seems to reference the entirety of the server, >>> workers and resource manager that live within the repository at [2]. Is >>> that correct? >>> >> >> Yes, that is what pulpcore means. >> >> >>> 2) What is the 'server' called? I keep wanting to call it the >>> 'pulp-api-server' or 'pulp-api-app' or 'pulp-api'. >>> >>> >> I like the name pulp-rest-api or pulp-api. >> >> >>> >>> - Eric >>> >>> [1] >>> https://docs.pulpproject.org/en/3.0/nightly/glossary.html#term-pulpcore >>> [2] https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>> >> _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
