+1 > >>>>> Our Pulp 3 development environment already gives you the option > >>>>> to pick between different Fedora versions, CentOS, CentOS + > >>>>> FIPS, Debian, etc.
And at least for developing pulp3 in the debian box, i can state that it works like charm. Thank you for making this distro agnostic. On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 13:53:52 -0400 Dana Walker <dawal...@redhat.com> wrote: > +1 > > Dana Walker > > She / Her / Hers > > Software Engineer, Pulp Project > > Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com> > > dawal...@redhat.com > <https://www.redhat.com> > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 1:18 PM Grant Gainey <ggai...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:52 PM Kersom <ker...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:33 PM Brian Bouterse > >> <bbout...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:13 PM David Davis > >>> <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> David > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:50 AM Daniel Alley <dal...@redhat.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Absolutely! This applies to Pulp 2 only. > >>>>> > >>>>> Our Pulp 3 development environment already gives you the option > >>>>> to pick between different Fedora versions, CentOS, CentOS + > >>>>> FIPS, Debian, etc. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:44 AM Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019, 11:40 AM Daniel Alley <dal...@redhat.com> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Proposal: The pulp/devel repository will install a CentOS 7 > >>>>>>> base box instead of a Fedora 28 one > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Rationale: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> * CentOS / RHEL is what our users are using. Using a different > >>>>>>> platform can result in different behavior in the development > >>>>>>> environment vs what users see -- this happened to me recently > >>>>>>> and wasted a couple of hours on both the Dev and QE sides > >>>>>>> * Fedora 28 is EOL and no longer receiving updates > >>>>>>> * Pulp 2 the custom dev installation script (pulp-dev.py) is > >>>>>>> broken on Fedora 29+ and I deemed it probably not worth the > >>>>>>> time or effort to fix > >>>>>>> * The RPM plugin is also broken on Fedora 29+ -- legacy > >>>>>>> "createrepo" was obsoleted entirely and as far as I can tell > >>>>>>> you can't import some of the libraries we are using from that > >>>>>>> package anymore > >>>>>>> * There's little point in tracking fast-moving Fedora changes > >>>>>>> at this point in Pulp 2's lifecycle anyways > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I have a branch that already works on CentOS. It's a few > >>>>>>> patches behind but would take about 5 minutes to get cleaned > >>>>>>> up. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Any objections? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This sounds good to me. I hope we are still developing and > >>>>>> testing on Fedora for Pulp 3, though? > >>>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list > >>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com > >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >>>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Pulp-dev mailing list > >>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com > >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >>>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Pulp-dev mailing list > >>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com > >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Pulp-dev mailing list > >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >> > > > > > > -- > > Grant Gainey > > Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat System Management Engineering > > _______________________________________________ > > Pulp-dev mailing list > > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
pgpzD2iMnT8vb.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev