+1

> >>>>> Our Pulp 3 development environment already gives you the option
> >>>>> to pick between different Fedora versions, CentOS, CentOS +
> >>>>> FIPS, Debian, etc.

And at least for developing pulp3 in the debian box, i can state that
it works like charm. Thank you for making this distro agnostic.


On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 13:53:52 -0400
Dana Walker <dawal...@redhat.com> wrote:

> +1
> 
> Dana Walker
> 
> She / Her / Hers
> 
> Software Engineer, Pulp Project
> 
> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com>
> 
> dawal...@redhat.com
> <https://www.redhat.com>
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 1:18 PM Grant Gainey <ggai...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:52 PM Kersom <ker...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >  
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:33 PM Brian Bouterse
> >> <bbout...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>  
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:13 PM David Davis
> >>> <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>  
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> David
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:50 AM Daniel Alley <dal...@redhat.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>  
> >>>>> Absolutely!  This applies to Pulp 2 only.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Our Pulp 3 development environment already gives you the option
> >>>>> to pick between different Fedora versions, CentOS, CentOS +
> >>>>> FIPS, Debian, etc.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:44 AM Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019, 11:40 AM Daniel Alley <dal...@redhat.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>> Proposal:  The pulp/devel repository will install a CentOS 7
> >>>>>>> base box instead of a Fedora 28 one
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Rationale:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> * CentOS / RHEL is what our users are using. Using a different
> >>>>>>> platform can result in different behavior in the development
> >>>>>>> environment vs what users see -- this happened to me recently
> >>>>>>> and wasted a couple of hours on both the Dev and QE sides
> >>>>>>> * Fedora 28 is EOL and no longer receiving updates
> >>>>>>> * Pulp 2 the custom dev installation script (pulp-dev.py) is
> >>>>>>> broken on Fedora 29+ and I deemed it probably not worth the
> >>>>>>> time or effort to fix
> >>>>>>> * The RPM plugin is also broken on Fedora 29+ -- legacy
> >>>>>>> "createrepo" was obsoleted entirely and as far as I can tell
> >>>>>>> you can't import some of the libraries we are using from that
> >>>>>>> package anymore
> >>>>>>> * There's little point in tracking fast-moving Fedora changes
> >>>>>>> at this point in Pulp 2's lifecycle anyways
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I have a branch that already works on CentOS.  It's a few
> >>>>>>> patches behind but would take about 5 minutes to get cleaned
> >>>>>>> up.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Any objections?
> >>>>>>>  
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This sounds good to me. I hope we are still developing and
> >>>>>> testing on Fedora for Pulp 3, though?
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
> >>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
> >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
> >>>>>  
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
> >>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
> >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
> >>>>  
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Pulp-dev mailing list
> >>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
> >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
> >>>  
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pulp-dev mailing list
> >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
> >>  
> >
> >
> > --
> > Grant Gainey
> > Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat System Management Engineering
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pulp-dev mailing list
> > Pulp-dev@redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Attachment: pgpzD2iMnT8vb.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Reply via email to