On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 12:17 PM Brian Bouterse <bmbou...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Recently with pulp_ansible, users were interested in using pagination with > LimitOffsetPagination [0]. Pulp currently defaults to PageNumberPagination. > I looked at our current DRF defaults, and I noticed two things. > > 1. We default to the not-as-common PageNumberPagination based on examples > in the drf docs. > 2. We customize it here [1] in various ways. > > Can someone help me remember why these pagination style choices were made > or where the requirements came from? > I believe the motivation is described here: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3801 > Would our bindings work with a LimitOffsetPagination style? > Yes, the bindings will work with anything that uses query parameters for pagination. > What use cases drove the use and customization in this area? > > Also, @katello how would a pagination style change (like switching to > LimitOffsetPagination) affect you? > > Thanks for any info you can provide. Maybe what we have right now is just > what we need, but I'm not sure. > > -Brian > > [0]: > https://www.django-rest-framework.org/api-guide/pagination/#setting-the-pagination-style > [1]: > https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/blob/master/pulpcore/app/pagination.py > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
