+1 from me. I never understood the dissection. It was never clear, why content serializers should be core, while the whole stages process should be api.
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:50:54 -0400 Mike DePaulo <mikedep...@redhat.com> wrote: > +1. > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 3:26 PM Pavel Picka <ppi...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:23 PM Dana Walker <dawal...@redhat.com> > > wrote: > >> +1, more straightforward > >> > >> Dana Walker > >> > >> She / Her / Hers > >> > >> Software Engineer, Pulp Project > >> > >> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com> > >> > >> dawal...@redhat.com > >> <https://www.redhat.com> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 2:55 PM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> David > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 2:38 PM Daniel Alley <dal...@redhat.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> Very Large +1 > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 2:10 PM Brian Bouterse > >>>> <bmbou...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Having just released RC7, there are a variety of problems we are > >>>>> dealing with as a result of having pulpcore and pulpcore-plugin > >>>>> being in separate repos. @daviddavis and I were talking, and we > >>>>> want to ask for feedback on merging the code from > >>>>> pulpcore-plugin into pulpcore. > >>>>> > >>>>> I wrote this up as an issue here: > >>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/5580 > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks! > >>>>> Brian
pgp0jFu8b8VNp.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
