Thank you. It sounds good for pulp_rpm. However, since not all the blockers are resolved at this moment, there is no full confidence that we'll be able to release pulp_rpm on Dec 12. The likelihood of solving them by that day is high, so let's set it as a goal for pulp_rpm.
Tanya On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 1:54 AM Ina Panova <ipan...@redhat.com> wrote: > Brian, > Thank you for the provided details. > > Ack, on releasing pulp_container on Dec 12. > > On Thu, 5 Dec 2019, 18:52 Brian Bouterse, <bmbou...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Releasing takes time, and we need pulpcore to be available before the >> releasing of plugins can start. Here's a proposed timeline to allow that to >> happen. >> >> Dec 10 - 22:00 all code merged to 'master' >> Dec 11 - pushing pulpcore 3.0.0 GA to pypi, then pulp_file 0.1.0 to pypi. >> Announce only to pulp-dev (not the official announcement) >> Dec 12 - pulp_rpm, pulp_container release >> Dec 12 - the docs.pulpproject.org and pulpproject.org website changes >> are applied >> Dec 12 - Send out announcement to pulp-dev, twitter, and blog >> >> @ttereshc and @ipanova how does this look to you for releasing pulp_rpm >> and pulp_container on the 12th? >> >> Any feedback or adjustment is welcome; please let me know. >> >> Thanks! >> Brian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev