+1 to use bindings to test Pulp 3. We've already started using them (thanks to @dkliban) for pulp-2to3-migration initial testing. https://github.com/pulp/pulp-2to3-migration/blob/master/pulp_2to3_migration/tests/functional/test_file_migration.py
Tanya On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 11:32 PM Bruno Rocha <bro...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > +1 to this idea, we have discussed that a little bit in QE some time ago > in this issue[1] > > This can solve the constants files dependency the current pulp-smash > testing has. > > [1] https://github.com/PulpQE/pulp-smash/issues/1182 > > Bruno Rocha > > Senior Quality Engineer - Management QE - Pulp Project > *irc*: rochacbruno > > *social*: http://about.me/rochacbruno > > “Progress is the realization of utopia.” > <https://red.ht/sig> > > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 6:03 PM Brian Bouterse <bmbou...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> I believe we have an opportunity to improve Pulp's testing through the >> use of bindings tests. I wrote up an epic to gather ideas and discussion. >> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/5888 >> >> Initially this would be for pulpcore and pulp_file, but the idea is we >> would enable this automatically via the plugin_tempalte. Comments are >> welcome! With more input, I hope we can prioritize this work. >> >> Thanks, >> Brian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev