FYI, pulp_gem has been moved to the Pulp org. I feel like we should maybe clarify in the future which plugins belong under the Pulp org but the general consensus among Pulp members is we should move it and I didn't want to hold back transferring pulp_gem.
David On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:27 AM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > Can I ask the motivation for moving pulp_gem to the pulp org? I was > actually thinking we should maybe consider moving plugins out of the Pulp > org to alleviate the stress on resources such as Travis. > > If we decide to move pulp_gem into the Pulp org, I'll be happy to do the > leg work. > > David > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:39 AM Matthias Dellweg <dell...@atix.de> wrote: > >> I would like to suggest to move the pulp_gem plugin to the pulp >> namespace on GH. >> What do you all think? >> >> Who should i ask for help to perform the transfer? >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
