On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 6:00 AM Tatiana Tereshchenko <ttere...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Brian, > > I agree with the problems identified. > I'm concerned that the same plugins have a different set of features > in Pulp 2 and Pulp 3, e.g, pulp_rpm. Having it just marked as compatible > with both Pulp 2 and Pulp 3 might create an assumption that the same > features are available for both Pulp 2 and Pulp 3. > Some plugins are separated or renamed, it's hard to mark them compatible > or not, e.g. Pulp 3 pulp_file should be marked as a part of Pulp 2 > pulp_rpm? Pulp 2 pulp_docker - a part of pulp_container in Pulp 3? > > I wonder if we should keep pulp 2 and pulp 3 plugins separate, maybe on > the same page but not in the same table? > Alternatively, many footnotes with clarifications might help. > Thanks for sharing this perspective, I agree with the concerns and the ideas to resolve. > Thanks, > Tanya > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 5:37 PM Brian Bouterse <bmbou...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> Melanie, >> >> I'm sending via pulp-dev for more visibility, but I wanted to see what >> you think specifically. Recently a user gave us feedback via an issue on >> Pulp 3 pain points for usage [0]. A lot of it is code and docs, and we're >> working to address those, but the last bullet says: >> >> "On the project page you tells that Pulp can manage plainty of repo type, >> but in fact if you take a fresh version only few plugins are working. Is >> there at least a compatibility/status matrix explaining that?" >> >> There are two issues we identified at the installer meeting. 1) The >> homepage claims one set of plugins that are pulp2 compatible but doesn't >> clearly state they are for pulp two.2) the pulp3 plugin table is not on the >> home page. >> >> What do you think about consolidating the "plugin list" on the homepage >> and the pulp3 plugins page into one table with two new columns "Pulp 2 >> compatible" and "Pulp 3 compatible" with X's or check mark icons in the >> cells where that compatibility exists? >> >> What do others think also? >> >> [0]: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/6658 >> >> Thanks, >> Brian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
