Jun 03, 2020

   -

   Triage - https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/issues?query_id=157
   -

   Should released issues receive the pulpcore milestone?
   -

      The concern is: what happens if pulp_installer needs to release
      asynchronously of pulpcore due to bugfix for example
      -

      If pulp_installer needs to be re-released to fix a bug, the release
      number should be incremented and the same milestone as the
original release
      be used.
      -

   Displays which plugins are compatible with the latest pulpcore:
   -

      Repo - https://github.com/fao89/pdc
      -

      Asciinema - https://asciinema.org/a/335533
      -

      Task written and added to sprint: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/6904
      -

   Galaxy dev install
   -


      
https://github.com/fao89/galaxy_ng_prerequisites/blob/master/tasks/main.yml
      -

      https://pulp.plan.io/issues/6696
      -

         Commented and closed because installer does collect static
         -

      Should we support source install with git url?
      -

      Wrote refactor task <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/6903> to merge
      galaxy_ng_prerequisites into pulp_installer:
      -

   Prereqs Epic
   -

      https://pulp.plan.io/issues/6797
      -

      Adding to sprint @fao89 to start into this work
      -

   Installer support of install-by-rpms-instead-of-pypi
   -

      https://pulp.plan.io/issues/6793
      -

   TLS support for the installer planning
   -

      https://pulp.plan.io/issues/6331

Action Items:

   -

   [all] learn more about pulp_database x geerling.postgres
   -

   Schedule a meeting to clean up redmine issues



-- 

Mike DePaulo

He / Him / His

Service Reliability Engineer, Pulp

Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/>

IM: mikedep333

GPG: 51745404
[image: image.png]

<https://www.redhat.com/>
_______________________________________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Reply via email to