Does anyone else have an opinion? If not, I am going to start by writing a task to remove this name uniqueness constraint for repositories.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 9:21 AM Ina Panova <ipan...@redhat.com> wrote: > This name uniqueness problem is extended to remotes and distributions, and > probably some other objects. > > > -------- > Regards, > > Ina Panova > Senior Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. > > "Do not go where the path may lead, > go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:14 PM Grant Gainey <ggai...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 4:56 PM Daniel Alley <dal...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> Why would it cause pain (to relax the restriction)? >>> >> >> Oh, good point - I was thinking backwards. Carry on, carry on... :) >> >> G >> -- >> Grant Gainey >> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat System Management Engineering >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
