Pulp 3: * Namespaces: design decision around namespace less distribution. * https://github.com/pulp/pulp_container/pull/158#issuecomment-698328942 * waiting on feedback from pulp-dev list * plan to ask jsherill for feedback * does it make sense to make it master/detail if merging the functionality into the pulpcore repo? * We plan to start defining RBAC work for "everything but namespaces" * start with repo and remote * AI ipanova will open 2 tickets for the upcoming sprint planning * remove authors file * https://github.com/pulp/pulp_container/blob/master/AUTHORS * AI ipanova will submit PR and ask Brian on legal implications in case he is aware * upcoming 3 months planning * focus on RBAC
Pulp 2: Open PRs: * https://github.com/pulp/pulp_container/pulls Un-triaged bugs: * https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp_container/issues?query_id=159 -------- Regards, Ina Panova Senior Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. "Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev