Just because you were not present, I carried over your items which were not
marked as done and the ones we were not sure about the next steps.
Feel free to adjust them as you see it.
We didn't assign anything new to you while you were away :)

Tanya

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 8:26 PM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Thanks for taking notes and sorry I couldn't be at the meeting. Can you
> explain more about the action item to give updates on the tagging story? I
> was planning on following up on the mailing lists with updates since I
> don't think the feature will be specific to pulpcore.
>
> As for the automatic merge PR (https://github.com/pulp/pulp-ci/pull/737),
> I wasn't planning on carrying forward an AI for it. I don't have any time
> to address in the near future but I'm happy to hand it off to someone else
> if they're interested.
>
> David
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:43 PM Tanya Tereshchenko <ttere...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Previous action items
>>
>>    - [david] To send out last call for feedback before merging
>>    https://github.com/pulp/pulp-ci/pull/737
>>       - Hold off until after Github Actions move
>>    - [fao89] look at driving forward release automation.
>>       - Automate post-release steps (branching, bumping to dev versions,
>>       updating template config, etc)
>>       - https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7817 (needs grooming, please provide
>>       feedback)
>>       - https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7818 (needs grooming)
>>    - [david] a Pulp query that shows issues for pulpcore (filters out
>>    installer, operator, etc)
>>       - Done: https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/issues?query_id=166
>>    - [david] move django fips repo to pulp
>>       - Done: https://github.com/pulp/django/
>>    - [david] notify pulp-list mailing list of 3.9 release schedule
>>    - [ttereshc] file a task to have task management code manage working
>>    dir
>>    - [david] to start on tagging planning
>>       - https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7127
>>       - Started. Met with David Newswanger yesterday.
>>       - Hope to have draft design by next week.
>>
>> <https://hackmd.io/XfI9DxymSAu6UJnblh7prQ?both#Topics>Topics
>>
>>    - two feature plans pending for pulp-dev discussion
>>       - parallelizing orphan cleanup while avoiding runtime
>>       errors(ipanova)
>>          - started writing down a proposal
>>       - alternate content sources(bmbouter)
>>          - needs feedback
>>          - meeting with Katello next week
>>          - https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7832
>>       - RBAC pulpcore issue
>>       - https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7710
>>       - 3.9 blocker
>>    - how to remove a plugin, including the relevant data in the db
>>       - pulpcore-manager command?
>>          - checks if the plugin is installed
>>          - if not, drops all <plugin_app_label>_* tables?
>>       - use cases
>>          - migration plugin is the one which everyone would want to
>>          remove eventually
>>             - it’s needed for katello
>>             - if no general solution is available, we will make some
>>             custom one for the migration plugin only
>>          - incompatible plugins, one might want to remove one
>>       - ttereshc to create a task
>>    - Validate existing group on pulpcore?
>>       -
>>       
>> https://github.com/ansible/galaxy_ng/pull/572/files#diff-6b9632eb49cb924f729282743cdac58a36f7625974fef12da2ea7b946ac19866R32
>>       - pulpcore uses Django Group model, not a custom one, so likely no
>>       need
>>          -
>>          
>> https://github.com/django/django/blob/7af8f4127397279d19ef7c7899e93018274e2f9b/django/contrib/auth/models.py#L109
>>       - 3.10 release
>>       - Tentatively planned for Jan 8? due to holidays. Feedback welcome.
>>          - probably too early, maybe end of January?
>>             - Galaxy NG will likely need a release of pulpcore at the
>>             end of Jan’21
>>             - Conference driven release
>>             - Decide after 3.9 release
>>          - Needs volunteer to release
>>    - An assumption in the ArtifactSaver stage that a d_artifact always
>>    has a remote.
>>       -
>>       
>> https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/blob/master/pulpcore/plugin/stages/artifact_stages.py#L297
>>          - Is it intentional?
>>             - Not intentional
>>             - move the check on line 300 couple of lines up
>>          - Currently causes issues for the migration
>>          - https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7876
>>
>> <https://hackmd.io/XfI9DxymSAu6UJnblh7prQ?both#Action-items>Action items
>>
>>    - [david] To send out last call for feedback before merging
>>    https://github.com/pulp/pulp-ci/pull/737
>>       - Hold off until after Github Actions move
>>    - [fao89] look at driving forward release automation.
>>       - Automate post-release steps (branching, bumping to dev versions,
>>       updating template config, etc)
>>       - https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7817 (needs grooming, please provide
>>       feedback)
>>       - https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7818 (needs grooming)
>>    - [ttereshc] to file a task to implement plugin removal
>>    - [fao89] to figure out the use case for this fix
>>    
>> https://github.com/ansible/galaxy_ng/pull/572/files#diff-6b9632eb49cb924f729282743cdac58a36f7625974fef12da2ea7b946ac19866R32
>>    - [david] updates on tagging planning https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7127
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Reply via email to