I'm +1 to this plan and the removal of pulp-smash from PyPI. On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:26 AM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Yes, that's the plan. Sorry I didn't mention that in my email. > > David > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:23 AM Mike DePaulo <mikedep...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> It's declared in many plugins' test dependencies without the git path, >> such as pulp_file/functest_requirements.txt >> >> I often install those as part of my installer development, and support >> for other teams. >> >> So I agree with this approach, but update the plugins too. >> >> -Mike >> >> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:16 AM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> It recently came up that the pulp-smash release PyPI is badly out of >>> date. It's an extra burden to release it and it doesn't seem to have any >>> benefit. So instead we're considering using the git repo directly (see [0]) >>> but I wanted to first check if that's a problem for anyone? >>> >>> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/pull/1210 >>> >>> David >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Mike DePaulo >> >> He / Him / His >> >> Service Reliability Engineer, Pulp >> >> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> >> >> IM: mikedep333 >> >> GPG: 51745404 >> <https://www.redhat.com/> >> > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev