Mairin Duffy wrote:
Michael DeHaan wrote:
Sorry for the late reply, I was looking over the pulp features list
up on the Wiki a few weeks ago.
Serious question -- it seems the features mentioned for Pulp (other
than interface features) are suitable to be added to Cobbler in ways
that requires people use less tools
Where would the interface live, then?
On top as a separate piece, making calls to a cobbler server? Does
that mean pulp would be the interface piece only?
~m
Spacewalk maybe?
FWIW, I'm thinking about making cobbler-web a seperate package in a
future release as well (I'm pondering moving to Rails to allow some
content to be better accessed by ovirt, and also to make better use of
mcpierce's rubygem-cobbler module), and am considering various upgrades
related to Cobbler's new ACL support, so there's time to consider
improvements to the way repos are being managed today as well.
Ultimately I think where such UI bits go depend on what you would want
to see. From the list of functionality we see now I don't see why they
couldn't be in there.
--Michael
_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
