----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Ortel" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 12:52:08 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [Pulp-list] Source Tree Review
All, Please review and comment on proposed pulp source tree refactoring as described here: https://fedorahosted.org/pulp/wiki/Architecture#Proposed2. This is pretty close to where we ended up after the meeting but different enough to warrant review before we start refactoring this afternoon. -jeff +1 for server side. My only question is on client. We decided that pulp-client and pulp-admin will be two separate packages. If they are, then part of our core modules need to be shared between the two. Is this refactoring taking that into account? The client side seems pretty much exactly as we have except for renaming pulptool -> client. If thats a different task then rest looks fine. ~ Prad _______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list -- -- Pradeep Kilambi Red Hat Systems Management [email protected] Phone: +1 919 754 4285 RHCE/RHCDS # 805008680430554 _______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
