If this is occurring, consider it a bug. The packages on the f/s should
not be duplicated. Please open a bugzilla
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pulp) with the
specific details; include the pulp version. Assuming the checksum type
for both repos is the same.
Thanks!
-Todd
On 01/19/2012 01:19 PM, Golden, Joel wrote:
If a clone points to the same file set of the master repo, why is the
amount of disk space consumer 2X?
Best Regards,
Joel Golden, RHCE
TW Telecom
Unix Support / Senior Systems Administrator
v. 303.542.6617
-------------
The content contained in this electronic message is not intended to
constitute formation of a contract binding *tw telecom*. *tw telecom*
will be contractually bound only upon execution, by an authorized
officer, of a contract including agreed terms and conditions or by
express application of its tariffs. This message is intended only for
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee
or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail or by telephone.
_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
