On 09/20/2012 05:32 AM, Cliff Perry wrote:
On 09/19/2012 02:21 PM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
On 09/19/2012 09:05 AM, Jay Dobies wrote:
I've been dancing around this issue for months now and it's starting
to give me a headache.
Agree that RPM is much nicer.
Toying, I could try to suggest Fedora Content, RHEL stuff, neither of
which are nice. RPM is 'RPM +stuff', but calling it RPM and in any man
pages just making sure it states not just RPM :)
Cliff
+1 to "RPM repository"
~ Prad
Ok cool, thanks for the feedback. Despite my desire to make Ash say
"URGH" and refer to them as yum repos, the overall consensus is clearly
for RPM. I think he's right, anyone using Pulp will understand that it
means RPM+, but hearing other people say that placates my OCD about
having a more all encompassing name.
Thanks :)
--
Jay Dobies
Freenode: jdob @ #pulp
http://pulpproject.org | http://blog.pulpproject.org
_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
