On 09/26/2012 01:54 PM, Andreas Piesk wrote:
Hello list,
I'm evaluating pulp 1.1.11 for mirroring RHEL channel in our data centers and
noticed an issue with
the errata processing which is serious in my book because if the incomplete
files lists.
let's take errata RHBA-2012:1305 for example. Red Hat published for "RHEL 6
Workstation i386" the
following affected packages (see
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1305.html):
openswan-2.6.32-19.el6_3.src.rpm
openswan-2.6.32-19.el6_3.i686.rpm
openswan-debuginfo-2.6.32-19.el6_3.i686.rpm
openswan-doc-2.6.32-19.el6_3.i686.rpm
this is an errata spanning multiple repos, namely 'optional' and 'os':
updateinfo.xml "rhel-i386-workstation-optional-6":
<id>RHBA-2012:1305</id>
<title>openswan bug fix update</title>
<issued date="2012-09-24 00:00:00"/><updated date="2012-09-24 00:00:00"/>
<pkglist><collection short="rhel-i386-workstation-optional-6">
<filename>openswan-doc-2.6.32-19.el6_3.i686.rpm</filename>
</collection>
</pkglist>
updateinfo.xml "rhel-i386-workstation-os-6":
<id>RHBA-2012:1305</id>
<title>openswan bug fix update</title>
<issued date="2012-09-24 00:00:00"/>
<updated date="2012-09-24 00:00:00"/>
<pkglist><collection short="rhel-i386-workstation-6">
<filename>openswan-2.6.32-19.el6_3.i686.rpm</filename>
</package></collection></pkglist>
but pulp-admin shows only one filename, the one from repo 'os':
$ pulp-admin errata info --id RHBA-2012:1305
Id RHBA-2012:1305
Title openswan bug fix update
Type bugfix
Issued 2012-09-24 00:00:00
Updated 2012-09-24 00:00:00
Version 1
Release
Status final
Packages Effected openswan-2.6.32-19.el6_3.i686.rpm
Reboot Suggested False
References
href : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1305.html
type : self
id : None
title : RHBA-2012:1305
a json dump of errata in 'class Info(ErrataAction)' shows:
"id": "RHBA-2012:1305",
"issued": "2012-09-24 00:00:00",
"pkglist": [
{
"name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6 for 32-bit
x86)",
"packages": [
{
"arch": "i686",
"epoch": "0",
"filename": "openswan-2.6.32-19.el6_3.i686.rpm",
"name": "openswan",
"release": "19.el6_3",
"src": "openswan-2.6.32-19.el6_3.src.rpm",
"sum": [
"sha256",
"02deefd2ab19a440da74992fa03ae1de7e9a2dd017fc42257981027ade0a7206"
],
"version": "2.6.32"
}
],
"short": "rhel-i386-workstation-6"
}
],
"repoids": [
"rhel6Workstation-i386-os",
"rhel6Workstation-i386-optional"
],
as far as i understand the code, the first errata with this id, in this case
from
"rhel6Workstation-i386-os" is stored and assigned to
"rhel6Workstation-i386-os". the errata with the
same id from "rhel6Workstation-i386-optional" has the same timestamp and is
ignored
(sync_updateinfo_data()) _but_ the id is saved and used in _add_erratum() to
assign this errata to
"rhel6Workstation-i386-optional".
so basically the errata from one repo with a filelist x is used for all repos
which have the same
errata but with a dfferent filelist.
as i'm not sure how pulp is designed to process erratas spanning different
repos i'm reluctant to
make changes to fix it.
i hope someone can shed some light on the issue. How should the erata
processing work?
thanks for reading.
regards,
-ap
Hi Andreas:
Looks like you're right. Pulp as it currently is, checks whether errata
exists and if so if the date is newer. If both conditions meet, it
assumes the errata exists. In your specific case since both conditions
satisfy and the rpms associated are yet to be linked from other repo it
skips. I opened a bug on this with your description from this email.
Here is the link to the bug,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860800 .
I'll look into this issue asap. Will keep you posted.
Thanks,
~ Prad
_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
