Yeh we are having problems where new RPM's are not always showing and it isn't to do with the meta cache local on the box as we do a yum clean all each time, sometimes they show and sometimes it's still showing only the old version when we push a new file up and publish. It seems intermittent and has only started happening since we upgraded 2.5 it has been fine for months on 2.4 and i noticed that this looks like a new feature implementation.
i can investigate further and raise a bug. On 5 December 2014 at 17:25, Barnaby Court <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, This is by design. If files have not been removed from the repo we > perform an incremental publish which does not remove the old files. If an > RPM is removed from the repo we will perform a clean publish. The > repomd.xml will only reference the new files so yum should play nice. > > -Barnaby > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jon Shanks" <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, December 5, 2014 12:16:53 PM > Subject: [Pulp-list] quick functionality question about repo metadata > > Hi, > > I can't tell if there is a bug or if it's a new feature in pulp between > 2.4 and 2.5 but the publish repo seems to create a new timestamped > directory for the publish however the repodata directory still seems to > retain other checksums and grows with each run i.e. the primary, filelist, > updateinfo and other xml metadata seems to retain the previous meta > information from the previous runs. > > Is there some reason for this? > > Thanks > > Jon > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
