On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:41:13AM -0500, Randy Barlow wrote: > On 02/11/2015 06:13 AM, Claer wrote: > > If I use the recursive flag, I'll end up with BREPO looking exactly as > > AREPO. I > > want BREPO to looks like this : > > - firstrpm-1.0-2 > > - secondrpm-1.0-1 > > - thirdrpm-1.0-1 > > Ah, I understand now. So you are suggesting that the --recursive flag > should only copy if the packages that satisfy the requirement are not > already in the destination, rather than just copying them all. > > This is an interesting suggestion. What do others think of it? Should > this be an RFE against the --recursive flag? Should there be two kinds > of recursion with two flags? Is it fine the way it is? >
My opinion is that the current behaviour is still correct because it allows us to pick the latest dependencies as well. So maybe a second option to trigger the behaviour would be great. We could also imagine to have a --dependencies-from-repo=orig,epel option which would default to orig (the repo where you copy the rpms from) but I am diverting :) > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list -- (o- Julien Pivotto //\ Open-Source Consultant V_/_ Inuits - https://www.inuits.eu
pgplwBLUB6jeB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
