I think I know the answer here, but I can always ask. What is the preferred way to manage something like a CentOS Base repo in pulp with regards to minor releases? In your typical yum repo file, you'd have $releasever. As far as I'm aware, this expands to $MAJOR.$MINOR (i.e., 6.6, 5.3, etc). The pulp repo is going to be a static name, so if we rev from 6.6 to 6.7 and have 6.6 in the feed, we lose it. I'm pretty sure that CentOS-Base functionally symlinks the $MAJOR release repo to the current $MAJOR.$MINOR repo (6 is symlinked to 6.6), so is the preferred way to just sync the $MAJOR folder? This gets more interesting when you are working with a package that doesn't necessarily pin $MAJOR to $MAJOR.$MINOR.
Thanks, -- Sean Waite [email protected] Cloud Operations Engineer GPG 3071E870 TraceLink, Inc. Be Excellent to Each Other
_______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
