Nick, I'm glad you made it onto the list!
The blog post about trying pulp with docker is still current. It's a convenient way to experiment with a non-production-quality deployment. I'm not aware that anyone has made a nulecule definition, but I'd love to see it if someone has. The most likely suspects would be Mark Lamourine and Aaron Weitekamp, who I've copied here. Keep us posted! Michael On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:50 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > [3rd attempt, as I wasn't subscribed at all the first time, and hadn't > confirmed my subscription the second...] > > Hi folks, > > I'd like to run up a Pulp server locally on Fedora 22 in order to work > on a separate application that makes it easy to consolidate a selected > subset of COPR repositories into a single Pulp RPM repo, and configure > Pulp to keep them updated automatically. > > The example Vagrantfile assumes I want to work on Pulp itself - I > don't, I just want a local Pulp installation to interact with. > However, I'm not clear on which parts of that I can remove while still > getting a working Pulp instance at the end of the process. > > Digging around to see if there was a current Nulecule app definition > for Pulp brought me to > http://www.pulpproject.org/2015/05/21/use-docker-to-try-pulp/ > > Is the latter still current? There were also a couple of completed > Trello cards suggesting there *was* a Nulecule app definition for Pulp > available, but they were marked as completed without any reference to > where the work had been done, or instructions on how to run the > result. > > Regards, > Nick. > > -- > Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia > > > -- > Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-list mailing list > Pulp-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list Pulp-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
