On 4 September 2015 at 01:55, Randy Barlow <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 I think this is a great idea. I was thinking a bit about it, and it > occurred to me that repo groups might be a nice data structure to do this > with. We are hoping to move towards strongly typed repos, but nothing says > that the repos in a repo group have to be the same type. If Pulp introduced > a way to promote repo groups (similar to repo promotion), I think that would > go a long way towards helping you accomplish this idea.
As a slight variant on this idea, for an S2I image, there's actually a trio of components at the top: your source repo, your builder image, and the topmost image in the runtime layer stack (which then brings in the rest of the layers). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | [email protected] | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
