Forgot: I'm using Pulp 2.7


Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: "Adam.Winberg" <adam.winb...@smhi.se>
Date: 17/12/2015 11:20 (GMT+01:00)
To: pulp-list@redhat.com
Subject: [Pulp-list] dependency problems when copying errata with --recursive

I'm syncing Redhat repos every night and then copy rpms from these to my
own 'frozen' repos every thursday. To minimize the number of updates I
want to copy only 'Important' and 'Critical' errata to my frozen repos.
I use this command to achieve this:

$ pulp-admin  rpm repo copy errata --match="severity=Important|Critical"
--from-repo-id rh-repo-daily --to-repo-id rh-repo-frozen --recursive


The problem is that the --recursive flag does not copy all dependencies,
or maybe it copies too many. For example, this week there was an
important kernel errata. The kernel is depending on the 'perf' package
which in turn is depending on the 'perl' package which in turn is
depending on the 'perl-libs' package. So all of these were copied to my
frozen repo. However, there is about a gazillion other perl packages you
need to copy to avoid version mismatch and failed update, but these are
not included. So, pulp is not able to read those dependencies (in the
form of, for example, "perl(Cwd)").

Besides, the copy of the perl rpm was not needed at all in the first
place, since I already had perl in my frozen repo. It all ended with me
having to manually delete a number of packages from my frozen repo to
get the updates to work. This happens quite often and is causing a lot
of work for us. I could revert back to copying everything, but I would
really like to be able to only copy relevant packages.


There was some discussion regarding this in an a thread from February
(https://www.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/2015-February/msg00009.html)
with suggestions to add an option to skip copying of a rpm if it is
already present in the target repo. However, there was no RFE created
that I know of - is there one or could one be created? Or am I missing
some already existing way of fixing this problem?

Regards
Adam Winberg

_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list

Reply via email to