See I think that's kind of odd. I'd love to know the reasoning behind that because we very much enjoy being able to treat the pulp server like every other server w/r/t updates (unlike Satellite 5 & Satellite 6).
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Konstantin M. Khankin < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Lutchy, > > I remember some piece of documentation saying "you'd better update pulp > server not from itself, preferably from the internet" > > 2016-05-02 17:11 GMT+03:00 Lutchy Horace (Mailing List) < > [email protected]>: > >> hi, >> >> > This is how I test the consumer code on my development environment. >> > Seems like you should be able to do the same thing for your >> > deployment. I would also appreciate input on this from others. >> >> I am bit awry of doing this on a production pulp server but I will give >> this a shot. I assume I have to create a pulp repository within >> pulp server itself for pulp-server updates. >> >> Regards >> >> -- >> Lutchy Horace >> Owner/Operator/Administrator [http://www.lhprojects.net] >> Owner/Operator/Administrator [http://www.bombshellz.net] >> Owner/Operator/Administrator [http://www.animehouse.club] >> About Me [http://about.me/lhprojects] >> USA >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list >> > > > > -- > Ханкин Константин > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
