I have received some feedback on the proposed story grooming process. I have 
made some changes based on that feedback and moved the content to a public 
etherpad[0].

The main difference from the first version is the lack of the "groomed" state 
for a story. Once the author thinks a story has all the details outlined in the 
etherpad, the story is marked as sprint candidate and discussed at sprint 
planning. 

Please provide feedback in etherpad or on list.

  Thanks,
  Dennis


[0] https://etherpad.net/p/pulp-story-planning

_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list

Reply via email to